11.3 C
New York

Liberia: Former Finance Minister Tweah’s $8m Bond in Jeopardy, Risks Arrest

Published:


Monrovia — Former Finance Minister Samuel Tweah might still face arrest despite posting a US$8 million property bond, as state prosecutors have identified several defects with the bond, rendering it potentially invalid and insufficient for securing his freedom.

The state prosecutors have filed notice of exception challenging the legality of the bond, citing that “the properties as contained in the statement of property evaluation and the Real Estate Tax Demand Notice and the Real Property Tax Division’s state of property evaluation, are purportedly owned by Rudolph S. Cole and Refina J. Cole.” Further compounding the issue, the Liberia Revenue Authority (LRA) reports no records to substantiate the ownership or value assessment for the properties listed, specifically property identification number 25115.

Adding to Tweah’s troubles, one of the properties, the prosecutors are seeking the disqualification of the property with identification number 33933 due to an outstanding tax lien of US$23,737.80, as revealed by the LRA.

In a communication from LRA Commissioner General Dorbor Jallah to the Solicitor General, Cllr. Augustine Fayiah, it was revealed that “the property with identification number 33933 with property valuation of US$6,000,000.00 does not currently exist in the LRA’s system.” Jallah detailed further discrepancies, noting, “It is also observed that the US$6,000,000.00 was initially imputed into the system on February 17, 2023, and attracted a tax bill of US$15,000. It was subsequently voided and reinputted at the value of US$600,000.00 with a tax bill of US$1,500.”

Commissioner General Jallah further stated, “Randolph S. Cole and Rafina J. Cole’s property is yet to be indentified and assessed by the valuation section of the Real Estate Tax Division since it was discovered on February 20, 2023 when the US$6,000,000 was inputted into the system on February 17, 2023.”

Moreover, the prosecutors argued that even if the properties were properly listed and unencumbered, they would still not meet legal standards because “the bond ought to be twice the amount embezzled in addition to the maximum number of months of imprisonment multiplied by US$25.”

Another point of contention raised by the prosecutors concerns the overextension of the bond’s coverage, as Mr. Tweah’s criminal appearance bond was already serving as surety in another case involving co-defendant Stanley Ford. They stated, “The obligors under Mr. Tweah’s criminal appearance bond was earlier filed by co-defendant Stanley Ford as criminal appearance bond.”